Poster
# 86

Main Page

6th Internet World Congress for Biomedical Sciences

IndexIndex
One-page version
Dynamic pages

THE EFFECT OF INTERMITTENT AND CONTINUOUS CLORGYLINE ADMINISTRATION ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF QUINPIROLE INDUCED LOCOMOTOR SENSITIZATION

Kirsten Culver(1), Henry Szechtman(2)
(1)(2)McMaster University - Hamilton. Canada

[ABSTRACT] [INTRODUCTION] [MATERIAL & METHODS] [RESULTS] [FIGURES] [DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS] [REFERENCES] [Discussion Board]
MATERIAL & METHODS Previous: VASCULAR ISCHEMIC MYELOPATHY: CLINICAL - ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL MULTIMODAL INVESTIGATION FIGURES
[Neuroscience]
Next: <FONT color="#0000FF">Protective Effects of Endogenous Adenosine<BR>
Against Excitotoxin in Rat Hippocampus</FONT>

RESULTS

As shown in Figure 1, quinpirole produced a robust sensitization in the QNP+SAL group, as evidenced by a 5-fold increase in locomotor activity on Injection 8, compared to Injection 1 (p<0.001, paired t-test). Clorgyline, regardless of whether administered via osmotic mini-pump or subcutaneous injection, blocked the induction of locomotor sensitization (Injection 1 vs Injection 8; p>0.05, paired t-test). Both groups of clorgyline treated rats (QNP+CLG and QNP+CLGinj) displayed an acute locomotor response to the test injection of quinpirole, no different from that of the SAL Control group (p>0.05), and significantly lower than the QNP sensitized group (p<0.05, Duncan multiple range test). This finding shows that clorgyline, regardless of whether it is administered continuously or intermittently, blocks the induction, rather than merely the expression of quinpirole-induced locomotor sensitization.

As shown in Figure 2, repeated injections of quinpirole reduced the percentage of time spent engaged in mouthing activity in the QNP+SAL group on Injection 8, compared to Injection 1 (p<0.05, paired t-test). In contrast, regardless of whether administered via osmotic mini-pump or subcutaneous injection, clorgyline significantly increased the percentage of time spent mouthing (Injection 1vs Injection 8; p<0.05, paired t-test). Both groups of clorgyline treated rats (QNP+CLG and QNP+CLGinj), engaged in significantly more mouthing activity on the test injection of quinpirole compared to the SAL Control and QNP+SAL groups (p<0.05, Duncan multiple range test). Mouthing activity occurred predominantly in the last 15 minutes of the testing period, and consisted primarily of self-directed behaviors such as nibbling of the tail and paws, and licking of the fur around the neck and chest (data not shown).


Discussion Board
Discussion Board

Any Comment to this presentation?

[ABSTRACT] [INTRODUCTION] [MATERIAL & METHODS] [RESULTS] [FIGURES] [DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS] [REFERENCES] [Discussion Board]

MATERIAL & METHODS Previous: VASCULAR ISCHEMIC MYELOPATHY: CLINICAL - ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL MULTIMODAL INVESTIGATION FIGURES
[Neuroscience]
Next: <FONT color="#0000FF">Protective Effects of Endogenous Adenosine<BR>
Against Excitotoxin in Rat Hippocampus</FONT>
Kirsten Culver, Henry Szechtman
Copyright © 1999-2000. All rights reserved.
Last update: 12/01/00