Poster
# 91

Main Page

6th Internet World Congress for Biomedical Sciences

IndexIndex
One-page version
Dynamic pages

Occupational Accidents Involving Sharp Instruments:1997/1999 - Comparative and Prospective Study

João Tadeu Damian Souto Filho(1), Sandro Bichara Mendonça(2)
(1)(2)FMC - Campos dos Goytacazes. Brazil

[ABSTRACT] [INTRODUCTION] [MATERIAL & METHODS] [RESULTS] [DISCUSSION] [CONCLUSIONS] [BIBLIOGRAPHY] [Discussion Board]
MATERIAL & METHODS Previous: To Breastfeed is To Love (Lactar é Amar) Previous: Occupational asthma caused by psyllium dust (Plantago ovata)
[Occupational Health]
DISCUSSION
[Hygiene, Public Health & Preventive Medicine]
Next: PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF AMRITA BINDU AGAINST ACUTE AFLATOXIN TREATMENT-INDUCED ALTERATION OF THE ANTIOXIDANT STATUS IN FISHES.
[Infectious Diseases]
Next: Age and regional peculiarities of the microbe landscape of the nasal mucosa.

RESULTS

We interviewed 163 health care workers of the Ferreira Machado Hospital. They were grouped in this proportion: 17% physicians, 27% medical students, 4% nurses, 48% nurse assistants, 2% cleanness servants and 2% laundry servants. This number was analyzed in 1997 and in 1999.

In 1997, occupational accidents with sharp instruments occurred with 68% of physicians, 52% of medical students, 71% of nurses, 76% of nurse assistants, 0% of cleanness servants and 0% of laundry servants. In 1999, we have accidents with 57% of physicians, 63% of medical students, 66% of nurses, 63% of nurse assistants, 20% of cleanness servants and 2% of laundry servants.

Specifying with which sharp instrument the accident occurred, we had in 1997, 53% with needles of syringe, 7% with needles of suture, 11% with scalpels, 0% with scissors and 29% with ampoules. In 1999, the same question showed this results: 40% with needles of syringe, 17% with needles of suture, 17% with scalpels, 15% with scissors and 11% with ampoules.

The frequency of making laboratorial exams in case of occupational accident, we found in 1999: 12% of physicians, 27% of medical students, 0% of nurses, 38% of nurse assistants, 0% of cleanness servants and 0% of laundry servants. In 1997, it was: : 89% of physicians, 68% of medical students, 0% of nurses, 54% of nurse assistants, 0% of cleanness servants and 0% of laundry servants.

And the question if the occupational accident was notified to the Hospital Infection Control Center of HFM, in 1997 was answered positive in 8% of physicians, 0% of medical students, 0% of nurses, 14% of nurse assistants, 0% of cleanness servants and 0% of laundry servants. And in 1999, 8% of physicians, 0% of medical students, 0% of nurses, 22% of nurse assistants, 0% of cleanness servants and 0% of laundry servants.


Discussion Board
Discussion Board

Any Comment to this presentation?

[ABSTRACT] [INTRODUCTION] [MATERIAL & METHODS] [RESULTS] [DISCUSSION] [CONCLUSIONS] [BIBLIOGRAPHY] [Discussion Board]

MATERIAL & METHODS Previous: To Breastfeed is To Love (Lactar é Amar) Previous: Occupational asthma caused by psyllium dust (Plantago ovata)
[Occupational Health]
DISCUSSION
[Hygiene, Public Health & Preventive Medicine]
Next: PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF AMRITA BINDU AGAINST ACUTE AFLATOXIN TREATMENT-INDUCED ALTERATION OF THE ANTIOXIDANT STATUS IN FISHES.
[Infectious Diseases]
Next: Age and regional peculiarities of the microbe landscape of the nasal mucosa.
João Tadeu Damian Souto Filho, Sandro Bichara Mendonça
Copyright © 1999-2000. All rights reserved.
Last update: 14/01/00