Poster
# 46

Main Page

6th Internet World Congress for Biomedical Sciences

IndexIndex
One-page version
Dynamic pages

Occupational Exposure Assessment Through Evaluation of Correlated Measurements.

Mariarosa Re(1)
(1)Dipart. Medicina Preventiva, Occupazionale e di Comunitą. University of Pavia - Pavia. Italy

[ABSTRACT] [INTRODUCTION] [METHODS] [DISCUSSION] [CONCLUSIONS] [REFERENCES] [Discussion Board]
METHODS Previous: An Investigation On Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Management In Medical Institutions. Previous: An Investigation On Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Management In Medical Institutions. CONCLUSIONS
[Hygiene, Public Health & Preventive Medicine]
Next: To Breastfeed is To Love (Lactar é Amar)
[Occupational Health]
Next: Occupational asthma caused by psyllium dust (Plantago ovata)

DISCUSSION

As demonstrated by a literature search through recent years on MEDLINE, a great number of scientific reports deal with multiple exposure. However, many studies concern cases of multiple exposure where concentrations of chemical agents are not likely to be correlated. Such cases occur when multiple exposure is not due to use of mixtures of chemicals, but to simultaneous presence in workplaces of contaminants originating from different sources. As a consequence, concentrations of chemicals are expected not to be correlated, but to vary independently from each other, as a function of individual emitting sources or working operations.

A series of working activities where correlated concentrations are very likely to be found is grouped in Table 1 with the following specifications: (a) type of working activity, with bibliographic references; (b) chemical agents responsible of multiple exposure; (c) monitoring method (E.C.: by determination of each component; I.S.: by determination of an index substance; A.I.S.: by determination of an added index substance; T.A.: by determination of total amount; P.M.: by predictive model).

It is remarkable that use of correlation-based methods for multiple exposure monitoring is reported just in two studies (10,13), although from the point of view of feasibility it is likely to be more advantageous than the adopted methods , at least for routine exposure monitoring. Of course determination of each component of the mixture is the ideally correct technique , but it is not easily applicable for routine exposure monitoring.

Table 1 - Multiple occupational exposure with expected correlated concentrations.

Type of working activity

(references)

Chemical agents

Monitoring methods

(E.C., I.S., A.I.S., T.A., P.M.)

Art Glass Manufacturing

(2)

Welding

(4)

Painting, paint removing

(1,3,10,11,12)

Aluminum smelter

(13)

 

Aluminum smelter

(14)

Coking plant

(6)

Coke oven

(15)

Forestry-logging

(16)

Electric utility industry

(17)

Insecticides application

(18)

Chemical elements

 

Metals

 

Solvents

(ketones, ethylacetate, toluene)

PAH

(Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)

PAH

 

PAH

 

PAH

 

Chain saw exhaust

 

Diesel exhaust

 

Pesticides

E.C.

 

E.C.

 

E.C.

 

E.C., I.S.

 

 

E.C.

 

E.C.

 

T.A.

 

I.S.

 

I.S.

 

A.I.S.


Discussion Board
Discussion Board

Any Comment to this presentation?

[ABSTRACT] [INTRODUCTION] [METHODS] [DISCUSSION] [CONCLUSIONS] [REFERENCES] [Discussion Board]

METHODS Previous: An Investigation On Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Management In Medical Institutions. Previous: An Investigation On Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Management In Medical Institutions. CONCLUSIONS
[Hygiene, Public Health & Preventive Medicine]
Next: To Breastfeed is To Love (Lactar é Amar)
[Occupational Health]
Next: Occupational asthma caused by psyllium dust (Plantago ovata)
Mariarosa Re
Copyright © 1999-2000. All rights reserved.
Last update: 23/01/00