DISCUSSION
Although the CA1 was not damaged by the injection
of KA alone, the addition of an A1 adenosine
receptor antagonist, CPT, exacerbated neuronal
damage in the hippocampus, i.e., neuronal
cell loss also occurred in the CA1. Microglia
have thin and longer processes that were
typically ramified in both non-treated and
vehicle-injected rat brain. However, microglia
were activated and showed a typical ameboid
type morphology after the injection of KA
or KA/CPT. In addition, MHC class II antigen
was detected in the region of neuronal cell
loss, but was not detected in the vehicle-injected
rat brain. Several recent papers have reported
that KA neurotoxicity and ischemia induce
MHC class II-immunoreactive ameboid microglia
(Akiyama et al., 1988; Finsen et al., 1993;
Matsuoka et al., 1998b). In addition, reactive
microglia that express MHC class II have
been observed phagocytosing degenerated neuronal
elements in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's
disease, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome,
and other neuronal degenerative disorders
of humans (Dickson et al., 1993; McGeer et
al., 1993). Therefore, the induction of MHC
class II antigen suggests the strong activation
of glial cells. The regions in which glial
activation occurred correlated well with
those that showed KA- or KA/CPT-induced neurodegeneration.
The expression of c-Jun participates in neuronal
cell death (Bossy-Wetzel et al., 1997). After
KA-injection, numerous pyramidal neurons
in the CA3 showed apoptosis markers (Pollard
et al., 1994). In this study, c-Jun phosphorylation
may have preceded neurodegeneration. c-Jun
phosphorylation occurred in the same region
as where neurons underwent apoptotic cell
death. Recently, it has been shown that the
phosphorylation of c-Jun by the activation
of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) is important
for neuronal apoptosis using cultured cells
in vitro (Bossy-Wetzel et al., 1997; Eilers
et al., 1998; Herdegen et al., 1998; Schwarzschild
et al., 1997; Watson et al., 1998). These
reports suggest that phosphorylation of c-Jun
by the activation of JNK is closely associated
with KA-induced neuronal apoptosis in the
rat hippocampus in vivo. In this study, we
showed that treatment with CPT induces neuronal
and glial changes, such as neuronal cell
loss, neuronal apoptosis, and the induction
of MHC class II antigen, in the CA1 as well
as in the CA3. These results clearly indicate
that adenosine has neuroprotective effects
through similar events in the CA1 following
treatment with KA.
Adenosine increased membrane potassium conductance
and opened specific chloride channels through
the activation of A1 receptor (Trussell and
Jackson, 1985; Mager et al., 1990). Both
act together in generating hyperpolarizing
currents that stabilized the neuronal resting
membrane potential and antagonized depolarization,
and then the synaptically evoked neuronal
calcium influx through voltage-sensitive
ion channels is reduced (Schubert, 1988).
An A1 adenosine receptor can be activated
by nanomolar concentrations of extracellular
adenosine present under physiological conditions
in the normal rat brain (Ballarin et al.,
1991). An increase in the extracellular adenosine
concentration up to the micromolar range,
as observed in the ischemic brain (Hagberg
et al., 1987), will presumably further strengthen
the A1 receptor activation and raise the
threshold effect for a toxic calcium influx
to cause neuronal damage. Such a protective
threshold effect of endogenous adenosine
against neuronal damage is supported by in
vivo experiments (Donaghy and Scholfield,
1994). The massive calcium influx, through
a series of as yet unclear steps that may
involve phospholipase activity and the production
of free radicals from the arachidonic acid
pathway, eventually leads to lipid peroxidation
and cell death. Based upon the concept that
adenosine has neuroprotective effects (Schubert
et al., 1997), the effects of adenosine receptor
agonists were examined. Previously, administrated
(not endogenous) adenosine and its derivatives
have been shown to have neuroprotective effects
against ischemia and KA-induced neurodegeneration
(Heron et al., 1994; MacGregor and Stone,
1993, respectively). In this study, we found
that antagonism of the A1 adenosine receptor
exacerbated neurodegeneration. Furthermore,
this exacerbated neurodegeneration was attenuated
by the coadministration of an A1 adenosine
receptor agonist. These results strongly
suggest that endogenous adenosine has neuroprotective
effects in neurons.
The selective vulnerability of CA3 pyramidal
neurons to KA stimulation can be explained
by the predominant distribution of KA receptors
in the CA3 (Monaghan and Cotman, 1982; Werner
et al., 1991). This hyperexcitability in
the CA3 appears to be limited to within the
CA3, although CA1 neurons receive synaptic
inputs directly from CA3 neurons via the
Schaffer collaterals. One possible pathway
for CA1 neuronal death observed in this study
was that CPT antagonized the protective effects
of endogenous adenosine released in CA1.
The synaptic transmission of the Schaffer
collateral/commissural afferent in CA1 is
suppressed by extracellular adenosine released
during a tetanic stimulation (Sekino and
Koyama, 1992; Mitchell et al., 1993; Manzoni
et al., 1994). Thus, the hyperexcitation
of CA3 neurons induced by the KA treatment
can release adenosine that might prevents
neurons in CA1 from glutamate excitotoxicity.
However, the inhibitory effect of CPT against
NMDA- and hypoxia-induced suppression of
synaptic responses evoked by CA1 stimulus
was limited to partial (Manzoni et al., 1994;
Arlinghaus and Lee, 1996). These reports
suggest that another additional factor can
be involved in the widespread of neuronal
death in CA1. Recently, a novel intrahippocampal
pathway, the CA3-CA2-CA1 circuit, was identified
by a physiological technique (Sekino et al.,
1997). In the transverse hippocampal slices,
neuronal activity in CA3 propagates to CA1
only when the slices were treated by CPT
and activation of the CA3-CA2-CA1 circuit
is supposed to be involved (Sekino and Obata,
1995). As seen in the present study, CPT
seems to open a gate for synaptic transmission
between CA3 and CA1. This study also suggests
that endogenous adenosine plays a role in
regulating the signal flow from CA3 to CA1.
Immunohistochemical studies using an anti-A1
adenosine receptor antiserum raised against
purified rat brain A1 adenosine receptor
(Nakata, 1993) have shown that the adenosine
A1 receptor thought to be functioning postsynaptically
was distributed predominantly in the CA3a/CA2
subfield (Ochiishi et al., 1999). Removing
the tonic inhibition of this field can result
in enhancement of neuronal activity in CA1.
The present result also supports the hypothesis
that the CA2 field acts as a gate for signal
flow from the CA3 to the CA1. Based on these
observations, we consider that the administration
of A1 adenosine receptor antagonist exacerbates
neurodegeneration by i) negating the neuroprotective
effects of adenosine, and reducing the threshold
for bursting; and ii) reducing the threshold
of CA2 neurons which contribute to the CA3-CA2-CA1
circuit.
<Top Page> <Introduction> <Methods> <Results> <Conclusion> <References>